Impact of foreign-accented speech on thinking, judgment and decision-making

Objectives:

Foreign-accented speech leads to the categorisation of the speaker as an outgroup individual in terms of cultural and social heritage. At the same time, foreign-accented speech deviates from the listener’s standard pronunciation and can be more challenging to understand. Based on the hypothesis that social categorisation and language processing influence cognition, this project will investigate how foreign-accented speech impacts performance in tasks involving thinking, judgment, and decision-making, compared to native-accented speech. To accomplish this, the project will leverage wellknown cognitive biases (e.g., causality bias, repetition-truth effect, endowment effect) and decision-making frameworks (e.g., ultimatum game) to explore how information delivered in foreign- or native-accented speech affects cognition.

Expected Results:

In comparison to native-accented speech, (i) the increased cognitive demands involved in foreignaccented speech processing will cause the linguistic input to be processed more analytically, which, in turn, may reduce cognitive biases; (ii) the social categorisation of the foreign speaker will increase psychological distance from the speaker, affecting decision-making by reducing emotional engagement.

Supervisor:

Eduardo Navarrete

Doctoral Candidate:

Lea Gorisek

Updates on this topic

Here you can find all the latest developments on this topic.

About

Bridging Communication Gaps in Human and Human-AI Interactions: The Role of Accented Speech on Neurocognitive mechanisms and Social Dynamics